If you have been reading about quality control and want a single page that covers the useful parts, this is it: definitions, context, how it is studied, and the questions that come up repeatedly.
Last reviewed on 2026-05-14. Where a claim depends on a specific study, the study is described rather than over-claimed.
HPLC testing separates dissolved compounds by passing a liquid sample through a column packed with stationary phase. A pump delivers mobile phase at controlled flow, and the sample components interact differently with stationary and mobile phases. Compounds that spend more time in mobile phase elute earlier; those retained by stationary phase elute later. Detectors record elution as peaks, and peak area or height relates to amount. This mechanism underpins quantitative analysis of mixtures.
Most routine HPLC testing uses reversed-phase columns, where the stationary phase is nonpolar and the mobile phase is a polar mixture such as water with an organic solvent. Analytes partition between the two phases according to polarity, size, and charge. Gradients that change solvent composition over time can separate compounds with broad retention ranges. Isocratic conditions keep solvent composition constant and suit simpler mixtures. The choice of column chemistry, pH, and temperature affects selectivity and peak shape.
Detection in HPLC testing commonly relies on ultraviolet-visible absorbance, fluorescence, refractive index, or mass spectrometry. UV detection is widely used because many organic compounds absorb light, but it requires a chromophore. Mass spectrometry provides mass-based identification and high sensitivity for trace analytes. Each detector has trade-offs in selectivity, cost, and compatibility with mobile phases. Quantification typically uses calibration curves prepared from reference standards. Results are reported as concentration, purity, or presence above a limit.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, robustness, and solution stability. Accuracy reflects closeness to a reference value, while precision reflects agreement among repeated measurements. Specificity shows whether the method can measure the analyte without interference from matrix components. Validation is documented through protocols and reports, and the required extent depends on the method's use and regulatory context.
Routine quality control uses system suitability, blank injections, check standards, and control samples to detect drift or contamination. System suitability criteria may specify minimum resolution, maximum tailing factor, and a permitted range for repeated injections. Blank injections reveal carryover or solvent contamination, while check standards confirm calibration accuracy over a batch. Control samples with known analyte levels can show whether results remain within statistical limits. When a control result falls outside limits, the analyst investigates the cause and may invalidate affected results before repeating the batch.
Documentation and traceability are central to regulated HPLC testing. Records typically include instrument logs, column history, mobile-phase preparation, sample preparation, injection sequences, raw chromatograms, and audit trails. Electronic systems may require user access controls, time-stamped changes, and backup procedures. Training records show that analysts are qualified for assigned methods. Audits and inspections check whether written procedures match actual practice and whether deviations are documented. These controls support reproducibility and allow results to be reconstructed if questions arise later.
| Property | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Separation mode | Reversed-phase | Nonpolar stationary phase with polar mobile phase |
| Typical column particle size | 3–5 µm | Smaller particles improve resolution but raise pressure |
| Typical flow rate | 0.5–2.0 mL/min | Depends on column dimensions and pressure limits |
| Common detection | UV-Vis absorbance | Requires analytes with chromophores |
| Typical run time | 5–30 min | Varies with method, gradient, and sample complexity |
Validation establishes that a method is suitable for its intended purpose. Typical parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantification, robustness, and stability of standards and samples. Acceptance criteria are defined in advance, and results are documented in a validation report. Regulatory guidance for pharmaceuticals, foods, and environmental testing differs, so the applicable framework must be identified. Ongoing verification uses control samples and trend charts after validation. Method transfer to another laboratory may require partial revalidation.
Routine quality control includes blanks, duplicates, spiked samples, and certified reference materials. Calibration curves are prepared with standards at several concentrations, and the detector response is checked for linearity. Carryover, column aging, mobile phase evaporation, and temperature drift can shift retention times or peak areas. Maintenance such as replacing seals, filters, and columns helps prevent failures. Records of injections, integration, and deviations support traceability. Audits may request raw data and instrument logs for each batch.
Data handling and documentation are central to HPLC quality control. Electronic systems should have audit trails that record changes to methods, sequences, and results. Integration parameters, such as peak baseline and threshold, can affect reported areas and must be defined in advance. Out-of-specification results trigger a structured investigation that may include reanalysis, instrument checks, and review of sample preparation. Regulatory inspections often examine raw data, audit trails, and training records to verify that reported results are traceable and reliable.
Method validation establishes that an HPLC procedure is suitable for its intended use. Key parameters include accuracy, precision, specificity, linearity, range, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, and robustness. Accuracy measures agreement with a true or accepted value, while precision describes repeatability and intermediate precision. Specificity confirms that the method measures the analyte without interference from impurities, degradants, or excipients. Validation is documented in a protocol and report, and acceptance criteria are set before experiments begin. Regulatory guidance varies by region, but the general principles are widely harmonized.
System suitability testing is performed before and during analytical runs to confirm that the instrument and method are working as expected. Common checks include retention time, peak area, resolution between critical pairs, tailing factor, and theoretical plate count. Results are compared with predefined limits, and a failed check requires investigation before sample results are reported. Quality control samples at low, middle, and high concentrations are injected at intervals to monitor accuracy and precision. Blank injections detect carryover and contamination, while control charts track performance over time.
Anne Ephrussi studied biology at Harvard University in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from where she graduated in 1979. She continued to do her PhD at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the group of Susumu Tonegawa where she received her doctoral degree in 1985. Ephrussi performed postdoctoral research at Harvard University in the lab of Thomas Maniatis from 1986 to 1989 and at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research with Ruth Lehmann from 1989 to 1992. Since 1992, Anne Ephrussi has been a group leader at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL). She became the head of EMBL International Centre for Advanced Training in 2005. She served as Associate Dean (1999 - 2005) and Dean (2005 - 2008) of Graduate Studies of the EMBL International PhD program and as head of the developmental biology unit (2007-2021). She is part of numerous international Scientific Advisory Boards and Panels, organizes international conferences and scientific meetings and evaluates research grant and fellowship applications for a variety of renowned funding bodies.
The calculation uses 8,033 years, the mean-life derived from Libby's half-life of 5,568 years, not 8,267 years, the mean-life derived from the more accurate modern value of 5,730 years. Libby's value for the half-life is used to maintain consistency with early radiocarbon testing results; calibration curves include a correction for this, so the accuracy of final reported calendar ages is not affected.
The cell's energy is equal to the voltage times the charge. Each gram of lithium represents Faraday's constant / 6.941(atomic mass), or 13,901 coulombs. At 3 V, this gives 41.7 kJ per gram of lithium, or 11.6 kWh per kilogram of lithium. This is slightly more than the heat of combustion of gasoline; however, lithium-ion batteries as a whole are still significantly heavier per unit of energy due to the additional materials used in production. Note that the cell voltages involved in these reactions are larger than the potential at which an aqueous solutions would electrolyze.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
Vinylene carbonate is used widely as an electrolyte additive for lithium-ion batteries where it promotes the formation of an insoluble film between the electrolyte and the negative electrode: the SEI (solid-electrolyte-interface). This polymer film allows ionic conduction, but prevents the reduction of the electrolyte at the negative (graphite) electrode and contributes significantly to the long-term stability of lithium-ion batteries. A 2013 publication suggests that the cyclic sultone 3-fluoro-1,3-propanesultone (FPS) is superior to vinylene carbonate in SEI formation.
== Actions and psychopharmacology == CRH is produced in response to stress, predominantly by parvocellular neurosecretory cells within the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and is released at the median eminence from neurosecretory terminals of these neurons into the primary capillary plexus of the hypothalamo-hypophyseal portal system. The portal system carries the CRH to the anterior lobe of the pituitary, where it stimulates corticotropes to secrete adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and other biologically-active substances (β-endorphin). ACTH stimulates the synthesis of cortisol, glucocorticoids, mineralocorticoids and DHEA. In the short term, CRH can suppress appetite, increase subjective feelings of anxiety, and perform other functions like boosting attention. During chronic stress conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), blood serum levels of CRH are decreased in combat veterans with PTSD compared to healthy individuals. It is believed that chronic stress enhances the negative feedback inhibition of the HPA axis, resulting in lower CRH levels and HPA function. Abnormally high levels of CRH have been found in people with major depression, and in the cerebrospinal fluid of people who have committed suicide. Corticotropin-releasing hormone has been shown to interact with its receptors, corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1 (CRFR1) and corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 2 (CRFR2), in order to induce its effects.
is known as the kinematic viscosity. In this expression for Reynolds number, the characteristic length D is taken to be the hydraulic diameter of the pipe, which, for a cylindrical pipe flowing full, equals the inside diameter. In Figures 1 and 2 of friction factor versus Reynolds number, the regime Re < 2000 demonstrates laminar flow; the friction factor is well represented by the above equation. In effect, the friction loss in the laminar regime is more accurately characterized as being proportional to flow velocity, rather than proportional to the square of that velocity: one could regard the Darcy–Weisbach equation as not truly applicable in the laminar flow regime. In laminar flow, friction loss arises from the transfer of momentum from the fluid in the center of the flow to the pipe wall via the viscosity of the fluid; no vortices are present in the flow. Note that the friction loss is insensitive to the pipe roughness height ε: the flow velocity in the neighborhood of the pipe wall is zero.
By at least 1731, it was officially codified in Naval regulation that each sailor was rationed one pound (450 g) of biscuit per day. Hardtack was also utilized by the Pilgrims during their 1620 voyage, primarily due to its easy storage and long lifespan. However, the travelers struggled with insect infestation, as well as having to dip the hardtack into water for it to be edible. Hardtack, crumbled or pounded fine and used as a thickener, was a key ingredient in New England seafood chowders from the late 1700s. In 1801, Josiah Bent began a baking operation in Milton, Massachusetts, selling "water crackers" made of flour and water that would be resistant to deterioration during long sea voyages from the port of Boston. These were also used extensively as a source of food by the gold prospectors who migrated to the gold mines of California in 1849. Since the journey took months, hardtack was stored in the wagon trains. Bent's company later sold the original hardtack crackers used by troops during the American Civil War. The G. H. Bent Company operated in Milton and sold these items to Civil War re-enactors and others until 2018.
Sources: en.wikipedia.org
It separates components in a liquid sample and measures their amounts using a detector. Results can indicate concentration, purity, or identity based on retention time and detector response. The technique works for mixtures that can be dissolved and filtered.
It offers high resolution, reproducibility, and compatibility with many sample types. A single run can separate and quantify multiple analytes. It is common in pharmaceutical, food, environmental, and industrial laboratories.
Samples must be soluble in a suitable mobile phase and free of particles that can block the column. Detector response depends on analyte structure, so some compounds need derivatization or alternative detection. Complex matrices may require extensive sample preparation.
Validation establishes suitability for a new method, while verification confirms that a method works in a specific laboratory. Verification is often used when a validated method is adopted with existing equipment and staff. Both rely on documented acceptance criteria.